Dangote Group Clarifies Enugu Accident Truck Not Owned by Company The management of Dangote Industries Limited (DIL) has issued a clarification regarding reports linking one of its trucks to a recent tragic accident in Enugu State. According to the company, the truck involved in the incident does not belong to Dangote Group but to a
Dangote Group Clarifies Enugu Accident Truck Not Owned by Company

The management of Dangote Industries Limited (DIL) has issued a clarification regarding reports linking one of its trucks to a recent tragic accident in Enugu State. According to the company, the truck involved in the incident does not belong to Dangote Group but to a third-party operator.
The company’s statement followed an online media report which alleged that a Dangote truck was responsible for the crash that resulted in loss of lives. Dangote Industries, however, described the report as misleading and urged the public to desist from spreading unverified information.
I Can End Banditry In Two Months With Control Of Security – Zamfara Governor
Dangote’s Clarification
In its official statement, Dangote Industries Limited emphasized that an internal investigation revealed the truck in question was not part of its fleet. The company further noted that it was already engaging with relevant authorities to ascertain why the vehicle carried its logo despite not being owned or operated by the Group.
“We are actively engaging with the appropriate agencies to determine why the truck in question was bearing our logo, despite not being part of our fleet,” the statement read. “Moving forward, increased scrutiny will be applied to the unauthorised use of our brand identity, particularly the misuse of our logo on vehicles not affiliated with the Group.”
The company described the use of its branding on unaffiliated trucks as unacceptable and pledged to take stricter measures to curb such practices in the future.
Addressing Misinformation
Dangote Industries expressed concern about what it described as a recurring problem of misinformation linking its brand to unfortunate road incidents without proof. The management stressed that while the company usually avoids making public comments on individual cases, the frequent misrepresentation of facts has compelled it to respond.
“It is our policy not to comment publicly on individual cases,” the statement said. “However, we are compelled to address the increasing spread of misinformation by attributing such incidents to the Dangote Group without any substantiated evidence.”
The company appealed to both the media and the public to verify facts before disseminating information, particularly in sensitive matters involving loss of lives.
Appeal for Responsible Reporting
Dangote Industries Limited urged media practitioners and the general public to exercise caution and responsibility in reporting and sharing information about road crashes. It emphasized that spreading false claims not only misrepresents the company but also distracts attention from the real issues surrounding road safety and accountability.
“We urge the public and media to refrain from circulating unverified claims,” the management stated. “We remain committed to cooperating fully with the relevant authorities and urge that those tasked with investigating incidents of this nature be allowed to carry out their responsibilities without undue interference.”
The company further stressed that tragedies such as the one in Enugu should not be politicized or exploited for malicious or financial purposes.
Commitment to Corporate Responsibility
Dangote Industries used the opportunity to reiterate its commitment to corporate responsibility, safety, and integrity in its operations. It highlighted the company’s track record of compliance with safety standards and pledged to continue working towards minimizing risks associated with its logistics and transport services.
“The Dangote Group remains steadfast in upholding the highest standards of corporate responsibility, safety, and integrity in all our operations,” the statement concluded.
The Broader Issue of Truck Branding
The incident also sheds light on the broader problem of unauthorized use of corporate logos by third-party operators in Nigeria’s transport sector. Many logistics firms, small operators, and even individuals often brand their vehicles with the names and logos of big companies, either to gain patronage or avoid scrutiny.
In this case, Dangote’s investigation pointed to such misuse of its logo, which not only misled the public but also risked damaging the company’s reputation. By promising tighter scrutiny, Dangote has signaled a stronger push against the unauthorised use of its brand identity in the future.
The clarification from Dangote Industries Limited underscores the importance of accurate reporting and verification of facts before attributing incidents to corporate entities. While the accident in Enugu remains a tragedy that deserves full investigation, the company has distanced itself from ownership of the truck involved, stressing that the vehicle belonged to a third-party operator misusing its brand.
By committing to stricter measures against unauthorized logo use and reaffirming its dedication to corporate safety standards, Dangote Group has sought to protect its image while urging Nigerians to remain vigilant against misinformation.
At a time when road accidents involving heavy-duty trucks continue to claim lives across the country, the company also reiterated the need for cooperation with authorities to ensure accountability, justice for victims, and enhanced road safety.















Leave a Comment
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *