Fresh controversy has emerged over Nigeria’s prolonged security challenges following strong allegations by prominent human rights activist Deji Adeyanju. Speaking at a press conference on Tuesday, Adeyanju claimed that certain individuals within the military establishment are benefiting from the country’s ongoing insecurity.

The activist’s remarks have reignited national debate over the root causes of persistent violence, particularly in regions affected by insurgency and banditry. According to him, the scale and endurance of insecurity across Nigeria suggest the possibility of internal collaboration.

Adeyanju described insecurity as a “major business” in the country, arguing that those profiting from it have little motivation to see it resolved. He urged Nigerians to take a closer look at the situation, especially in the North East, where insurgency has lingered for over a decade.

“Insecurity is a major business in Nigeria. Those making money with insecurity in the Army don’t want it to end,” he stated during the briefing.

Lawmakers, Opposition Clash Over Penalty On Dual Party Membership

Reiterating his claims, Adeyanju insisted that the ongoing violence cannot be fully explained without considering the role of insiders. He alleged that some military officers may be complicit, either directly or indirectly, in sustaining the crisis.

The activist referenced the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan, recalling how the government took the controversial step of hiring foreign mercenaries at the height of the Boko Haram insurgency.

According to Adeyanju, the intervention by foreign fighters, reportedly from South Africa, led to rapid gains against insurgents. He cited the recapture of territories such as Gwoza and other areas that had previously been under militant control.

He further noted that the success of the operation was evident during the 2015 election period, when elections were postponed for six weeks, partly to allow security forces regain control of affected regions.

Adeyanju also raised concerns about alleged corruption within the military hierarchy. He pointed to ongoing investigations by anti-corruption agencies into the wealth of some senior officers, questioning the source of their assets.

“Where did they get their money from?” he asked, alleging that funds allocated for combating insurgency may have been diverted for personal enrichment.

The activist argued that the continuation of insecurity benefits those who control large security budgets. According to him, the ongoing violence ensures a steady flow of government funding for military operations, creating a system where ending the crisis may not be in the interest of certain individuals.

He warned that unless these underlying issues are addressed, Nigeria may continue to struggle with insecurity despite significant financial investments in defense.

Adeyanju’s claims, while unverified, have added to growing public concerns about transparency and accountability within the security sector. Analysts note that such allegations, if substantiated, could have far-reaching implications for national security policy and public trust.

As Nigeria continues to battle insurgency, banditry, and other forms of violence, calls for deeper investigations and reforms within the military and security agencies are likely to intensify.

For now, the accusations have further complicated an already sensitive issue, placing renewed pressure on authorities to respond and reassure citizens about efforts to restore lasting peace.