Nigeria Insurance Industry Reform Act 2024: How the New House Insurance Tax Impacts Landlords and Tenants

The Nigeria Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2024, has introduced sweeping changes to the real estate and construction sectors, mandating compulsory insurance for public buildings. This new framework, often described as the house insurance tax in Nigeria, is set to reshape how landlords and tenants engage with the property market. While the legislation aims to enhance safety and financial security, it also introduces new costs and compliance requirements that have sparked debates among stakeholders.

Overview of the New House Insurance Tax in Nigeria

The Act requires that owners or occupiers of public buildings—including commercial complexes and multi-tenant residential properties—must insure their properties against fire, collapse, earthquake, storm, and flood risks. Builders must also obtain liability insurance during construction to cover deaths, injuries, or damage to third-party property.

Failure to comply carries stiff penalties: fines of at least ₦1 million, imprisonment for up to three years, or both. By embedding insurance into the property lifecycle, the legislation seeks to raise safety standards, guarantee compensation for victims of disasters, and promote resilience within Nigeria’s real estate market.

Femi Otedola Opens Up On Losing N200 Billion In Oil Crash And Financial Missteps

Pros of the New Insurance Requirement for Landlords

1. Enhanced Property Protection
   Landlords now enjoy compulsory coverage against catastrophic risks. This significantly reduces financial exposure in the event of disasters such as building collapse or fire, providing peace of mind and safeguarding real estate investments.
2. Improved Safety Standards
   The requirement for builders’ liability insurance incentivizes higher construction quality and adherence to safety codes. This reduces the likelihood of structural failures, legal disputes, and costly repairs in the long run.
3. Increased Investor Confidence
   Properties with active insurance coverage are more attractive to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and institutional investors. The Act strengthens market stability, potentially raising property values and encouraging more investment in Nigeria’s real estate sector.
4. Potential Tax Deductions
   Insurance premiums paid on rental properties could qualify as deductible business expenses, lowering taxable income for landlords engaged in property leasing. This can partially offset the financial burden of the new insurance mandate.

Cons of the New Insurance Requirement for Landlords

1. Increased Financial Burden
   Landlords now face additional insurance costs, which can be significant, particularly for multi-property owners or those managing high-risk structures. Small-scale landlords may find these expenses overwhelming.
2. Risk of Rent Increases
   Many landlords are expected to pass on the cost to tenants. Discussions on X (formerly Twitter) suggest potential rent hikes of up to 6%, attributed to both fire and construction insurance premiums.
3. Severe Penalties for Non-Compliance
   Non-compliance exposes landlords to fines and possible imprisonment. This raises concerns about landlords who may struggle with the administrative and financial requirements of the new law.
4. Administrative Complexity
   Landlords must now navigate multiple regulatory steps, such as securing builders’ liability insurance before obtaining permits. This could slow down project timelines and increase bureaucratic hurdles.

Pros of the New Insurance Requirement for Tenants

1. Improved Safety and Security
   Tenants benefit indirectly from living in buildings that meet safety and insurance standards. This reduces the risk of injury or displacement in the event of disasters.
2. Tax Relief on Rent
   A notable provision of the Act allows tenants to deduct 20% of annual rent (up to ₦500,000) from their taxable income. This tax relief can reduce overall living costs, particularly for middle-income earners.
3. Better Property Maintenance
   Landlords may maintain buildings more diligently to avoid triggering insurance claims, which indirectly benefits tenants through improved living conditions.
4. Clarity in Tax Assessments
   By aligning housing with new tax laws, the Act introduces transparency in deductible expenses and compliance, giving tenants more predictable financial obligations.

Cons of the New Insurance Requirement for Tenants

1. Higher Rent Costs
   The most immediate downside is rent inflation. Tenants in Lagos and Abuja are already voicing concerns about affordability, with many expecting rents to rise by 5–6%.
2. Limited Direct Benefit from Insurance
   While landlords’ properties are covered, tenants’ personal belongings remain uninsured. To protect their possessions, tenants would need to purchase separate renters’ insurance, adding another financial layer.
3. Risk of Disruptions
   If landlords fail to comply, authorities may seal off non-insured properties. Tenants living in such buildings could face sudden eviction or disruption, despite paying rent.
4. Increased Financial Strain
   With Nigeria’s housing market already under pressure, tenants may have little negotiating power to resist rent hikes. Low-income households are particularly vulnerable to being priced out of rental markets.

Critical Analysis

The Nigeria Insurance Industry Reform Act, 2024, marks a turning point in integrating insurance into real estate. The law is designed to protect lives, reduce economic losses, and professionalize construction and housing standards.

For landlords, the law enhances property security and marketability but comes with significant new costs and regulatory responsibilities. Small landlords, in particular, could struggle to comply, potentially leading to reduced property supply if some exit the market.

For tenants, the law promises safer housing and tax relief but risks worsening affordability due to rising rents. The benefit of safer buildings may not outweigh the strain of higher living costs, especially when tenants’ personal belongings remain outside the insurance coverage.

The success of this policy will depend on the government’s implementation strategy. Authorities must ensure that landlords do not simply transfer the full cost burden onto tenants and that insurance companies have the capacity to handle the surge in policy demand. Furthermore, policymakers should consider subsidies or phased rollouts to ease the transition for both landlords and tenants.

The house insurance tax in Nigeria, introduced under the 2024 Insurance Industry Reform Act, presents a double-edged sword for landlords and tenants. While it offers stronger protections, better safety standards, and tax relief, it also introduces higher costs, compliance challenges, and potential rent hikes.

As Nigeria works toward a more resilient real estate sector, the balance between safety, affordability, and compliance will be crucial. Without safeguards to prevent cost transfer and protect vulnerable households, the Act could unintentionally deepen Nigeria’s housing affordability crisis.

For tenants, understanding their new tax relief options is key, while landlords must act swiftly to comply and explore possible tax deductions. The coming years will determine whether this reform achieves its intended goal of creating a safer, more stable property market or merely shifts financial pressure from landlords to tenants.