Former Vice President of Nigeria, Atiku Abubakar, has once again drawn national attention after disclosing that his unwavering loyalty in politics came at a heavy personal cost, including forced exile and multiple assassination attempts. The revelation was made during the public presentation of a new book titled “Loyalist Begets Loyalist”, authored by Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, the National Publicity Secretary of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

Speaking before a gathering of political figures, party loyalists, and intellectuals, Atiku used the occasion to reflect on the often-overlooked sacrifices associated with political loyalty in Nigeria. According to him, loyalty in public life is not always rewarded with protection or appreciation, but sometimes with persecution and danger.

Judge Withdraws From Malami’s N212.8bn Assets Forfeiture Case, CJ Orders Reassignment

Atiku explained that his experience was not unique, noting that many Nigerian politicians who chose to stand firm by principles and alliances have faced similar ordeals. He described how his loyalty to political ideals and associates led to years of hardship, including exile from the country in order to preserve his life.

He stated that both he and the book’s author, Mallam Bolaji Abdullahi, had endured significant challenges as a result of loyalty, emphasizing that such sacrifices are part of the price paid by many in Nigeria’s political space.

Facing Fear for Loyalty: Atiku’s Political Journey

During his remarks, the former vice president revealed that he survived several assassination attempts, which he directly linked to his political loyalty. He stressed that being loyal in Nigeria’s political environment often exposes individuals to serious risks, especially when loyalty conflicts with powerful interests.

Atiku noted that his decision to go into exile was not voluntary but necessary for survival. According to him, the experience serves as a reminder that loyalty, while often celebrated in theory, can attract hostility in practice. He added that these experiences should not discourage younger politicians but rather prepare them for the realities of leadership and public service.

Beyond personal experiences, Atiku used the platform to redefine what true loyalty should represent in governance. He cautioned against blind loyalty that promotes exclusion or suppresses dissenting voices. Instead, he argued that genuine loyalty must be rooted in accountability, transparency, and openness.

He emphasized that loyalty should not be used as a tool to narrow the circle of belonging or silence opposing opinions. Rather, it should strengthen collective goals and encourage leaders to listen, learn, and adapt, even when faced with disagreement.

The former vice president further explained that true loyalty embraces diversity of thought and protects the dignity of every citizen, regardless of political affiliation. According to him, leaders and aspiring leaders must internalize these values if Nigeria is to achieve sustainable democratic growth.

Atiku’s comments have since sparked renewed conversations around political loyalty, leadership ethics, and personal sacrifice in Nigerian politics. Many observers see his remarks as both a warning and a lesson, particularly for emerging political actors navigating the country’s complex political terrain.

As Nigeria continues to grapple with questions of governance, accountability, and inclusion, Atiku Abubakar’s reflections offer a sobering insight into the cost of standing firm in one’s convictions—and the resilience required to survive it.