‘I’m Not Divorcing Her’: Peller Rejects Calls to End Marriage With Jarvis

Popular Nigerian TikTok personality Peller has rejected calls for him to divorce his wife, Jarvis, following their recent public disagreement, insisting that he has no intention of ending their marriage.

Ebola: NCDC Approves ₦100,000 Weekly Stipend for Each Contact Under Monitoring

The content creator made his position known during a social media livestream, where he addressed reactions to the disagreement and denied suggestions that the couple were deliberately creating controversy to attract views or increase engagement.

Peller said his decision to marry Jarvis in a court ceremony came with responsibilities and consequences that he was not prepared to disregard.

Peller Speaks on Divorce Consequences

During the livestream, Peller claimed that divorcing Jarvis could expose him to a four-year prison sentence and require him to surrender 30 per cent of his property.

Explaining why he would not consider ending the marriage, the TikToker said their disagreement did not mean he was ready to walk away from the relationship.

“My wife and I aren’t suffering for views. We’re not fighting to rack up engagement or trend. Divorcing my wife now would mean going to prison for four years and giving her 30% of my property. That’s the consequence of my court wedding. I’m not divorcing her,” he said.

His remarks came amid public reactions to the couple’s disagreement, with some social media users reportedly urging him to end the marriage.

However, Peller maintained that the situation should not be interpreted as a publicity stunt or an indication that he intended to divorce Jarvis.

Denies Staging Disagreement for Social Media Engagement

Peller also dismissed suggestions that the couple were deliberately creating relationship drama to generate online attention.

The TikTok personalities have built a significant public profile through livestreams and social media content, making their personal interactions a subject of public discussion.

Peller’s denial suggests that he wants viewers to distinguish between the couple’s private relationship and the content they share online.

He did not, in the remarks provided, give further details about the disagreement or explain what led to the exchange between them.

The available account also does not include a response from Jarvis addressing Peller’s comments about divorce or the reported legal and financial consequences.

Viral Disagreements Put Couple in Spotlight

The latest development follows public attention surrounding an earlier exchange between the couple during a livestream.

In a related report, Jarvis and Peller were quoted as engaging in a disagreement in which Jarvis questioned whether her family would have chosen Peller as a husband for her.

The incident generated discussion among viewers about their relationship, although the material provided does not establish the full circumstances of the exchange or the couple’s private position following it.

Peller’s latest comments appear intended to make clear that, despite public disagreements and calls from some viewers, he is not planning to end the marriage.

Peller’s Claims About Divorce Remain Unverified

Although Peller attributed his decision to the consequences of their court wedding, his claims about a four-year prison sentence and the loss of 30 per cent of his property have not been independently verified in the information available.

The precise legal consequences of divorce depend on the applicable law and the circumstances of a marriage. His comments should therefore be understood as his own explanation rather than an established statement of the law.

For now, Peller has publicly rejected calls for a divorce and denied that the disagreement was staged to generate social media engagement.