Seyi Law Slams Psquare Over Criticism of Tinubu’s Government

Popular Nigerian comedian Seyi Law has taken a direct swipe at the renowned music duo, Peter and Paul Okoye, better known as Psquare, accusing them of hypocrisy for criticizing President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration. In a recent interview with veteran show host Teju BabyFace, Seyi Law called out the twin brothers for what he termed a “double standard” in their political commentary and involvement.

The outspoken comedian, who has publicly declared his support for the All Progressives Congress (APC), did not hold back in questioning the sincerity of Psquare’s political stance. He argued that their current criticism of President Tinubu is inconsistent with their past support for the APC, particularly during the inauguration of former President Muhammadu Buhari.

Tinubu Holds Emergency Security Meeting Amid Rising Killings in Plateau and Benue

Seyi Law Labels Psquare’s Criticism as Hypocrisy

Seyi Law pointedly reminded Nigerians that Psquare had once performed enthusiastically during Buhari’s swearing-in ceremony. He quoted the song the duo rendered at the event, saying: “E no easy ee ooooo. To sing and to dey dance and the people dey rejoice eee”, highlighting how they had celebrated the APC’s victory in the past.

“But today, Tinubu is the enemy,” the comedian added. “The same people who are against the APC today once danced on the stage when Buhari was inaugurated. Let’s stop the hypocrisy.”

The comedian emphasized that several celebrities who now wave flags of opposing parties once stood in support of the APC but have shifted allegiance without acknowledging their political past. He pointed out that consistency and honesty in political engagement are essential, especially when public figures influence millions of Nigerians.

Comedian Defends APC, Questions Selective Support

Seyi Law also criticized a recurring sentiment among some Nigerians and public figures who claim they would have supported the APC if Vice President Yemi Osinbajo had been the presidential candidate instead of Bola Tinubu. According to him, such claims are insincere.

“You knew if APC had brought Osinbajo, you would still have used the badge of Buhari to defeat him,” Seyi Law said. “Is he not the same Yoruba man? Stop being hypocrites.”

He implied that ethnicity and past affiliations would have been used to discredit even a candidate like Osinbajo, despite his reputation. The comedian argued that the narrative of selective support within the same party shows a bias that undermines real political engagement.

Political Tension Among Celebrities Deepens

This isn’t the first time Nigerian celebrities have publicly disagreed over politics. In the aftermath of the 2023 general elections, entertainment figures have been more vocal about their political leanings and grievances. Psquare has notably been critical of the APC, often expressing their dissatisfaction with the Tinubu-led government on social media.

The duo was also actively involved in supporting the Labour Party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, during the last election cycle. Their political activism was applauded by supporters of the opposition but has since drawn criticism from pro-government entertainers like Seyi Law.

The exchange underscores a growing divide within Nigeria’s celebrity community, as entertainers take more active roles in the nation’s political discourse. For Seyi Law, however, it is less about who supports which party and more about holding people accountable for their past actions and political choices.

Calls for Honest Political Engagement

As political debates continue to polarize Nigeria’s entertainment industry, the need for sincerity, consistency, and respectful dialogue has never been more urgent. Seyi Law’s comments have reignited discussions about the role of celebrities in shaping political opinions and whether they should be held to the same standards they demand from politicians.

While Psquare has yet to respond to Seyi Law’s remarks, the back-and-forth serves as a reminder that political discussions in the public sphere — especially when involving influential figures — require both responsibility and transparency.