Nigeria’s main opposition party, the Peoples Democratic Party, has intensified its internal leadership dispute by formally asking the Independent National Electoral Commission to withdraw recognition of Samuel Anyanwu as its National Secretary.

In a strongly worded communication sent through its legal representatives, Chief Chris Uche (SAN) & Co., the party cited a subsisting court judgment that affirmed Anyanwu’s expulsion. According to the PDP, the ruling—delivered by a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory on January 12, 2026—effectively ended his membership and authority within the party.

The development marks a significant escalation in the party’s internal crisis, raising fresh concerns about unity and stability within Nigeria’s opposition ranks as political activities gradually build ahead of future elections.

The PDP grounded its demand on what it described as a clear and binding judicial pronouncement. The party explained that its National Disciplinary Committee had earlier found Anyanwu guilty of alleged anti-party activities, recommending his expulsion—a decision later ratified by the party’s leadership.

While acknowledging that Anyanwu has filed an appeal, the party insisted that such action does not invalidate the judgment. It stressed that, under Nigerian law, a court ruling remains enforceable unless a stay of execution is granted or the decision is overturned by a higher court.

On this basis, the PDP argued that INEC is constitutionally obligated to act in line with the judgment. It maintained that continued recognition of Anyanwu by the electoral body undermines the authority of the judiciary and sets a troubling precedent.

Sowore Reveals Category Of People He Can Never Fight

The opposition party did not hold back in its criticism of INEC, describing the commission’s stance as an affront to judicial authority. It accused the electoral body of disregarding a valid court decision by maintaining Anyanwu’s status in its official records.

The PDP demanded immediate corrective action, including the removal of Anyanwu’s name from all INEC documentation and the cessation of any official dealings with him. It also called for the withdrawal of all recognitions and correspondences extended to him since the January 12 ruling.

Party officials warned that failure to comply could result in legal consequences, including contempt proceedings against INEC’s leadership. This warning underscores the seriousness of the dispute and the potential for further legal battles between the party and the electoral commission.

Beyond the legal arguments, the PDP expressed concern about the broader implications of the situation. It warned that INEC’s inaction could fuel perceptions of bias or complicity, particularly at a time when opposition parties are striving to maintain cohesion.

The party noted that such developments could contribute to instability within Nigeria’s political landscape, especially if internal disputes are not handled transparently and in accordance with the law.

Observers say the unfolding situation highlights ongoing tensions within the PDP, as well as the delicate role of INEC in managing party affairs while remaining neutral and law-abiding.

As the matter continues to evolve, all eyes remain on INEC’s next move and whether it will comply with the PDP’s demand or await further judicial clarification. The outcome could have lasting implications for party governance and electoral oversight in Nigeria.